Hungary's parliament has passed a law that would oust the sitting president, Reuters reports, in a move tied to what the news agency describes as a power shake-up driven by opposition politician Péter Magyar.

The legislation cleared the National Assembly of Hungary, the country's unicameral legislature in Budapest, which serves as the deciding body for national statutes. Reuters framed the vote as part of a broader realignment of political power connected to Magyar, who has emerged as a significant opposition figure in Hungarian politics and whose political movement appears to have secured sufficient parliamentary support to change the rules governing the head of state.

The report does not state the exact date of the vote, the final tally, or the statutory mechanism by which the law would remove the president from office. The news agency also does not quote the operative language of the statute or identify which constitutional or statutory provisions parliament amended.

What is clear from the reporting is the practical effect: once the law takes force under Hungary's constitutional framework, it would end the tenure of the current president before the expiration of the officeholder's term. For practitioners, this raises immediate questions about the legal basis for removing a head of state by ordinary legislation rather than by impeachment or constitutional amendment — mechanisms Hungary's Fundamental Law ordinarily contemplates for such situations. Lawyers advising clients with interests in Hungary will want to track whether the Constitutional Court, which retains the power to review legislation for conformity with the Fundamental Law, is asked to examine the statute, and whether any challenge is brought by the president, the government's own ombudsman-style officeholders, or another authorised petitioner.

The development also carries consequences for the stability of Hungary's executive arrangements. The president in Hungary holds a largely ceremonial role, but the office signs legislation into law, represents the state internationally, and exercises limited appointment powers. A change in the occupancy of the office, effected through parliament rather than an election, marks an unusual route in the Hungarian constitutional order.

Reuters describes the law as part of Magyar's power shake-up, indicating that the opposition politician's influence now extends to reshaping the composition of the presidency itself. The wire service's headline framing — "Hungary parliament passes law to oust president in Magyar's power shake-up" — is the fullest account of the measure currently available, and the underlying article contains additional detail on the vote and the political context that practitioners should consult directly.

Further reporting is expected to clarify the statute's effective date, the transition arrangements for the presidency, and any anticipated legal challenge before the Constitutional Court.